today’s news and information gleanings from here and there! 

Quote for today … “‘Hammers related she did not have to … listen to fire police’ because her husband is on borough council … ” – From court documents according to this York Dispatch article

• It’s kinda like actually being there according to this recent restaurant inspection at Carlos and Charlie’s! Anyone ever heard of Montezuma’s revenge?

• A complete listing of all inspections at food serving facilities in Lancaster, York counties and the entire state, except those in Columbia, are listed at the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Website.

• Interesting question from this New York Times opinion column: “The Supreme Court will soon consider whether to hear a case about digital privacy — particularly whether smartphones deserve special protection during searches.” “Whether or under what circumstances the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to conduct a warrantless search of the digital contents of an individual’s cellphone seized from the person at the time of arrest.”